Occupational Asthma Reference

Helenius I, Rytilä P, Sarna S, Lumme A, Helenius M, Remes V, Haahtela T, Effect of continuing or finishing high-level sports on airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and asthma: A 5-year prospective follow-up study of 42 highly trained swimmers, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2002;109:963-968,
(Plain text: Helenius I, Rytila P, Sarna S, Lumme A, Helenius M, Remes V, Haahtela T, Effect of continuing or finishing high-level sports on airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and asthma: A 5-year prospective follow-up study of 42 highly trained swimmers, J Allergy Clin Immunol)

Keywords: prognosis, exercise induced asthma, longitudial study, swimming

Known Authors

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Background:
Mild eosinophilic airway inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness—ie, mild asthma—have been shown to affect a high proportion of endurance athletes. The persistence of airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and asthma in this population is not known, however,
inasmuch as follow-up studies of athletes’ asthma have not been performed.

Objective:
The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of finishing high-level sports on airway inflammation, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and asthma.

Methods:
Forty-two elite competitive swimmers, most of them from the Finnish national team (37/42; 88%), were followed for 5 years in a prospective manner. All of the swimmers completed questionnaires and underwent resting spirometry, histamine challenge testing, and skin prick tests at baseline and at followup. Twenty-nine swimmers (69%) also gave induced sputum
samples on both occasions. Sixteen (38%) of the swimmers had continued their competitive careers during follow-up (active swimmers), but 26 (62%) had stopped competing more than 3 months before the follow-up examination (past swimmers).

Results: Bronchial responsiveness was increased in 7 (44%) of the 16 active swimmers at baseline and in 8 (50%) of the 16 active swimmers at follow-up; it was increased in 8 (31%) of the 26 past swimmers at baseline and in 3 (12%) of the 26 past swimmers at follow-up (McNemar test, P = .025). The difference in the change in bronchial hyperresponsiveness between the study groups was significant (likelihood ratio test, P =.023). Current asthma (defined as bronchial hyperresponsiveness and exercise-induced bronchial symptoms monthly) was observed in 5 (31%) of the active swimmers at baseline and in 7 (44%) of the active swimmers at follow-up; of the past swimmers, it occurred in 6 (23%) at baseline and in 1 (4%) at follow-up (McNemar test, P = .025). The difference in the change in current asthma between the study groups was significant (likelihood ratio test, P = .0040). The sputum differential cell counts of eosinophils and lymphocytes increased significantly during the follow-up period in the active swimmers (Wilcoxon signed rank sum test; P = .033 and P = .0029, respectively); in the past swimmers, the sputum differential cell counts of
eosinophils tended to decrease during the follow-up period (P= .17), whereas the differential cell counts of lymphocytes did not change significantly. The changes in the sputum differential cell counts of eosinophils between the study groups differed significantly (Mann-Whitney U test, P = .019).

Conclusion: In swimmers who had stopped high-level training, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma attenuated or even disappeared. Mild eosinophilic airway inflammation was aggravated among highly trained swimmers who remained active during the 5-year follow-up. Our results suggest that athletes’ asthma is partly reversible and that it may develop
during and subside after an active sports career.

Full Text

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo