Occupational Asthma Reference

Nafees AA, Allana A, Kadir MM, Potts J, Minelli C, Semple S, Matteis SD, Burney P, Cullinan P, A cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce respiratory effects of cotton dust exposure among textile workers – the MultiTex RCT study, Eur Respir J, 2023;:,DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01028-2023
(Plain text: Nafees AA, Allana A, Kadir MM, Potts J, Minelli C, Semple S, Matteis SD, Burney P, Cullinan P, A cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce respiratory effects of cotton dust exposure among textile workers - the MultiTex RCT study, Eur Respir J)

Keywords: cotton, byssinosis, Pakistan, control, am, FEV1,

Known Authors

Paul Cullinan, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK Paul Cullinan

Peter Burney, Kings College, London Peter Burney

If you would like to become a known author and have your picture displayed along with your papers then please get in touch from the contact page. Known authors can choose to receive emails when their papers receive comments.

Abstract

Background We determined the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce cotton dust-related respiratory symptoms and improve lung function of textile workers.

Methods We undertook a cluster-randomised, controlled trial at 38 textile mills in Karachi. The intervention comprised: training in occupational health for all workers; formation of workplace committees to promote a health and safety plan that included wet mopping, safe disposal of cotton dust, simple face masks, and further publicity about the risks from cotton dust. Participating mills were randomised following baseline data collection. The impact of the intervention was measured through surveys at 3, 12 and 18 months using questionnaires, spirometry, and dust measurements. The primary outcomes were (1) changes in prevalence of a composite respiratory symptom variable; (2) changes in post-bronchodilator percentage-predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), and (3) changes in cotton dust levels. These were assessed using two-level mixed-effects linear and logistic regression.

Results Of 2031 participants recruited at baseline, 807 (40%) were available at the third follow-up. At that point, workers in the intervention arm were more likely to report an improvement in respiratory symptoms (OR=1.58; 95% CI: 1.06–2.37) and lung function (%predicted FEV1, ß=1.31%; 95% CI: 0.04–2.57). Personal dust levels decreased, more so in intervention mills, although we did not observe this in adjusted models due to the small number of samples.

Conclusion We found the intervention to be effective in improving the respiratory health of textile workers and recommend scaling-up of such simple and feasible interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

Full Text

Full text of this reference not available

Please Log In or Register to add the full text to this reference

Comments

Please sign in or register to add your thoughts.


Oasys and occupational asthma smoke logo