BOHRF Original Authors' Main Conclusions
The original authors' main conclusions are taken from Abstract, Results and
Discussion. They are decided upon by the authors of the BOHRF occupational
asthma guidelines and form part of the guidelines.
Data from 3 cross-sectional studies in The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Sweden were used. Selection criteria were harmonized, resulting in a study population of 650 animal laboratory workers (60.6% female) with less than 4 years of exposure. Air allergen levels were assessed previously and converted on the basis of an interlaboratory allergen analysis comparison. Available sera were analyzed for the presence of specific antibodies against common allergens (house dust mite, cat, dog, and grass and birch pollen) and work-related allergens (rat and mouse urinary proteins). Questionnaire items on work-related respiratory symptoms, hours worked with rats per week, job performed, smoking habits, and sex were used in this analysis. A clear exposure-response relationship was observed for rat urinary allergen exposure and specific IgE antibodies against laboratory animals.
BOHRF Associated Evidence Statements
The BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines state that this reference is associated
with the following evidence statements
This page is showing the information from the BOHRF occupational asthma guidelines for this reference. To see additional information, including opinions left by users of this website please view the full reference. This page allows users to comment on the reference and suggest it as evidence for questions. These may be the existing questions from the Bohrf occupational asthma guidelines or questions that have been put forward by users of this website.